Monday, November 26, 2012

Shohamy, Brown Ch 23, 24



Lauren Watters
November 26, 2012
Shohamy
Brown Ch 23, 24
            Some teachers have a hard time distinguishing assessment from testing. I believe that assessment in the classroom is most useful for second language learners because it is an ongoing assessment that tests the students’ knowledge on certain topics. Tests measure knowledge in one given domain. I think it makes teacher’s jobs easier if they use a certain grading rubric. That way the teacher knows that they are grading each student fairly and by the same criteria. I think the best assessment for second language learners would be a portfolio. I really like the idea that students can see their work progress from the beginning of the year to the end. Students’ parents can also see the students writing and be able to see how their child is doing in the classroom. Practicality is also really important in the classroom for students. Teachers cannot give students a test that is not practical or give homework that takes each individual 10 hours to complete. Teachers need to make sure tests are reliable so when the teachers score the tests, they can grade the students on the same scale because the test is consistent. If the test is valid, it will measure what it is intended to. Validity can be established by observation and theoretical justification. A classroom test is designed to assess the masterly of grammar and communication use. I am also taking the Assessment and testing class for the TESOL endorsement and I have learned all of the above from that class. I think that class is very important for those who plan on teaching second language learners because it shows strategies and methods that can be used in the classroom. What should be used more in the classroom, testing or assessment?
            Norm-referenced tests are also standardized test that differentiate students by their performance. Criterion-referenced tests are designed to give test takers feedback. For criterion-referenced test, teachers are required to give appropriate feedback to students. Teachers need to have clear objectives and draw up test specifications from that. Drafting a test is important before giving it to students because it will give a good idea what the test will look like and how valid it will be. Revise, final editing and word processing the test is important so you as the teacher can make sure directions are clear, there are examples for each section, and if the difficulty is appropriate for your group of students. Before giving students the test make sure you go over what the test will cover and give practice if it is necessary. After the test is distributed, tell the students to concentrate and be reminded of the time limit while they are testing. After the test, include feedback and encourage questions from students.
Shohamy discusses how discourse can affect language testing and there are various ways discourse can affect this type of test. What is important is the extent to which these features are used in testing situation and how they affect test takers’ scores. Sometimes I forget that whoever writes the tests that students take, whether it is a first or second language learner, may not think about the audience they are writing for. Standardized tests for students can determine their entire future; it may be for class placement or to gain admittance for a university. Background knowledge could help some students advance quicker than others. However, knowledge of background knowledge does not affect test performance. The test writer(s) may not culturally understand some topics that are written and that could change the outcome of their results. What can test writers do to make the tests equal for all students? 

Monday, November 12, 2012

Brown Ch 9-11, Kumar Ch 13



Lauren Watters
November 12, 2012
Brown Ch 9-11
Kumar Ch 13

            As we talked about in class last week, there should be a certain rapport between students and teachers. Teachers should act in a certain way with their students. The product-oriented model of classroom observation is based on the assumption that a description is necessary in order to build a classroom behavior profile of the teacher. Some of the examples of these given only offer a narrow view of how the classroom can practice and progress. Process-oriented are meant to help teachers but aren’t always designed for them specifically. The tradition of classroom observation makes us focus on surface-level teacher performance but has driven us to neglect the understanding of learner perception of classroom events. The M&M observational scheme consists of preobservation, observation and post-observation. I am not sure if preobservation is really necessary. I know for any class that I have observed I have only completed the observation section. Most teachers that I observe don’t give me much background information about their class and I just leave as soon as I am supposed to. I think this observational tactic is a great idea but I am wondering if it will really be implemented. I know that when I observe I make sure to include as most detail as possible because after I leave that classroom, I will forget the majority of what happened. I think it is really important to write down what the classroom looks like. I feel like the classroom atmosphere can really help or hinder learning. The M&M observational idea is designed to help teachers and is the best way to get the most information in the easiest way.
            The second language curriculum development process diagram really helps lay everything out in an organized manner (151) because it shows how to design a course for students. It is obvious that the curriculum and lesson plans can be revised depending on the students. Situation analysis includes the steps in course design and analyzes that setting, audience and the needs of the students. In order to have an effective course it needs an educational setting, class characteristics, faculty characteristics, governance of course content, and assessment and evaluation requirements. A syllabus is very important, I think, so that students can follow along with it. One of my classes now does not have a syllabus and I do not like it because I personally like to plan ahead. I think it is a good idea for a teacher to pass out a syllabus at the beginning of the semester/year but say that it is subject to change. A syllabus also helps students to complete their assignments because they know when things are due and can’t really have excuses about not knowing the assignment was due. I agree with Brown in regards to lesson plans because not every teacher plans their lessons the same way, but most teachers agree there are certain things that belong in a lesson plan. For example, goals, objectives, materials, procedures, assessment and extra-class work should be included. I know that some teachers are more detailed with their lesson plans than others. Personally, I do not think it is necessary to time everything out and say for example, “Taking attendance will take 2 minutes, reading announcements will take 3 minutes, etc.” I believe that lesson plans should always have a rationale and always have extra things for students to do in case the lesson runs too short. Textbooks can sometimes be helpful in my opinion. Some of them seem tedious and just highlight key information. Only a few techniques do not involve the use of materials to support and enhance them. Other aids can be teacher resource books, self-made paper-based visual aids and commercially available visual aids. Individual work, group work and whole-class discussions need to be used in the classroom in order to keep variety alive.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Kumar Ch 11, 12 Brown Ch 26



Lauren Watters
Kumar Ch 11, 12
Brown Ch 26

Brown says that English has developed a special role in every country because it is used as a lingua franca. The English language is spoken in different varieties in all areas all of the country, but the most popular that people can recognize are different dialects from places like Boston, Texas and New York. Now, some people might say that these people are not educated because they do not speak “standard” or “correct” English. But what is Standard English? To me, it is using correct grammar and using the best vocabulary possible while writing, reading or speaking. Using the numbers 2 and 4 in place of words is not correct grammar. It can be used for social networking or for text messaging, but even then (as an English major) I am wary about it. I don’t want my students to think eliminated letters off of words or replacing words with slang is okay in the classroom. However, I understand as second language learners, this will happen. I have heard multiple times that the Midwestern dialect is the easiest to understand because people who reside here are easily understood, have no regional distinctive accent and pay attention to speech and grammar. While I was enrolled in another English class, I was told that people from the Midwest are used to speak for telephone automated messages because they are the easiest to understand. So are only people who born in the country thought to speak correct English? I think this is false because I know actors who have British accents that can speak with a nearly perfect Midwestern dialect. If we suggest to students that their dialect is wrong while they are learning the language, they will become discouraged and will possibly give up on learning English as a second language altogether. We need to encourage them to continue to speak the language even if they do not sound “standard”. The way a non-native speaker speaks English is going to be different for every individual. As a teacher you have to remind each language learning student to bring what they know about their L2 and also bring their skills from their L1.
            Culture to any individual is important and some pride themselves on their cultural background more than others. For example, I don’t really have that much cultural pride because I am 50% Bohemian. Bohemia is no longer an existing country in Europe. I am a mutt, a mixture of different cultures. Culture with a capital C means theatre, dance, music art and literature. Culture with a lower cased c means a personal construct of behavior, values, and beliefs that effect everyday life. I think that students should be able to share things from their L1 and their culture with the class. Everyone can become more educated about other languages, customs and cultures of a particular region. I don’t think that every teacher may think this is the best idea, but I like the idea of teaching students about other countries and customs that aren’t carried out in the United States. This can be a way of self-reflection to students. Self-reflection leads to cultural growth. What would be good activities for students to do in order to share with other classmates?

Monday, October 22, 2012

Brown Ch 22, Kumar Ch 7, 8


Lauren Watters
October 22, 2012
Brown Ch 22
Kumar Ch 7, 8

            Brown says that about ten years ago the profession of teaching was giving mixed message about how grammar and vocabulary should be integrated into the classroom. Only some language teachers do not focus on form. Grammar includes organizational competence, semantics and pragmatics. Grammar is the rules that show how to structure sentences. As an English Education major, grammar is a big part of my schooling and my life. Context is important with grammar as well. Grammar is a process. When I was in high school, I learned grammar in sections. Once every year was the time frame and the same material was covered every year: adverbs, adjectives and subject/verb agreement. But in English language learning classrooms should we be teaching grammar? Would this just confuse them even more to have grammar lessons or a grammar unit? The variables for deciding how to teach grammar in the classroom are age, proficiency level, educational background, language skills, style and needs and goals. I think that grammar needs to be taught in a two week span within teaching writing to students. Proper sentence structure, using the right voice, writing to an intended audience and teaching correct grammatical rules should be taught in unison. I think handouts with pictures would be best to teach students so they can match the pictures with the words. For vocabulary, I personally have always been taught to use note cards to memorize definitions. However, this is not a good strategy for long-term memory. Time needs to be allowed for students to comprehend the material and learn it in context. Bilingual dictionaries are helpful for students to have. As a teacher we have to remember strategies to help students develop vocabulary use and their grammatical skills. Individual, group work and whole class discussion need to be integrated in the classroom so students have a variety of learning strategies. Should we be using form focused instruction in the classroom or just use what we as teachers feel is best?
            Creating language awareness in the classroom is important. Language is important to the life of every individual. It helps us to understand each other and express ourselves. “We use it, misuse it and abuse it.” I think that even cursing is a prime example of this. We use these unacceptable words to show how angry or upset we are with an issue but those words are not acceptable in society (job interviews, with elderly people, etc.) Language awareness can be fostered in a general sense and in a critical sense. The majority of individuals have to seek to “light fires of curiosity about the central human characteristic of language which will blaze throughout our pupils’ lives.” Teachers want to light a fire in each student so they are excited about learning and want to further their education. However, some student’s fires get blown out when they are corrected too many times as a language learner in their writing, speaking or reading. We want the fire to continue to burn even after they are done with schooling. The American and British movement stresses the integration of language experience in the curriculum in secondary schools. It is suggested that secondary school teachers are trained in nature and function of language, language and thought and language and culture. I think all teachers whether they are teaching second language learners or not should be educated about the function of language. Sometimes students think that since they are not in an English classroom they do not have to use correct capitalization, punctuation, or sentence structure. They think that teachers only care about the content and not how it is written down. Some of my high school teachers were like that and would say “This is a math class, not an English class.” Well, that just navigates students into the mindset that language structure and form doesn’t matter unless they are in an English classroom. I think this also makes things ten times harder for the English teacher because they have to re teach students the correct way to form sentences, etc. If we teach students with heuristics, by letting them discover things on their own, there is a possibility that they will learn better. After practice, learners should know how to use correct speech and writing rules. I hope that as an English teacher I will be able to teach my students grammar in a way that is not tedious and boring. I don’t think that always simplifying grammar and English lessons to English language learners is the correct way to go about things. I want to be able to meet their needs and let them feel like they are learning challenging material.

Monday, October 8, 2012

Blog #6- Kumar, Brown, Cary

Lauren Watters
October 8, 2012
Brown 18, 19
Kumar 5, 6
Cary, S.

According to language learning, conversation is the best device to set the stage for acquisition. Using conversation while learning an L2 helps to engage in meaningful interaction: teacher to student, student to teacher and student to student. As a teacher, you should be promoting communication between students so they can become more fluent in their L2. While students are conversing, they can express their own experience of the learning process, but also talk about their life experiences in a different language. After taking just about seven years of Spanish, I am still embarrassed at my speaking and writing ability in my L2. When doing group work, it is easy to complete the task but then start speaking in English again. My professor for Business Spanish at Illinois State would walk around and discourage us from speaking any English, especially when we were talking about things that did not pertain to the class. It was hard for me to stop speaking English in the class because I didn’t know what I wanted to say in Spanish. My vocabulary was not wide enough. Of course in all of my Spanish courses, participation is a huge chunk of my final grade, but I felt like every time that I talked, I was being stared at and judged. I think this could be defined as my foreigner-talk, as Kumar discusses. I would deliver my words and sentences slowly, try to pronounce correctly, pause a lot when I couldn’t think of what I was going to say next, and substitute words. My professor, however, was a very understanding teacher because I had talked to her about my nerves while speaking, writing, etc. She used a lot of teacher talk with me so that I would not sound so idiotic when I was speaking in front of a majority of native speakers.

Input, interaction and output are important when learning an L2. Each individual has a zone of proximal development that is the distance between the actual level of language development and the level of potential development. But everyone does not have the same level of development, correct? I think that one person’s potential for their L2 is different from the next person. For example, some people in this class have much higher Spanish skills compared to me, but can I get on the same level as them? Will I ever become fluent? I personally highly doubt it unless I am fully immersed in the language all of the time. I would be forced to learn it. When I was taking Spanish classes, I did not like to actively participate so maybe if I tried a little bit harder, my L2 wouldn’t be the death of me. Because I feel embarrassed and not capable of speaking, reading and writing the language, I wanted nothing to do with it. I would put off homework, studying and anything else related to the Spanish classes I was enrolled in. I don’t want my students learning English as their L2 to feel the same way I do about Spanish. My question is how do I get them to feel the opposite way that I feel about my L2? Do I need to continue to use teacher talk? Maybe individual conferences would work with my students so I can ask them how they feel about learning their L2 and any questions/concerns they have. I want to promote autonomy within my students and I want them to achieve their goals inside the classroom. As an English major, I think every student should know how to critically think. Students should be interacting with themselves, the teacher and their educational surroundings. I like the Oxford Strategy system because it shows different strategies to use with students to maximize their learning. Microstrategies and mini lessons can help teachers introduce new topics to students without overwhelming them. Questionnaires are a good tool to use in order to get to know your students, but I don’t think that bombarding them with five different surveys is the best way to get to know the personalities in the classroom. It is a good idea to see what the students goals are, their lives outside of school and what kind of learning styles they prefer. That way you can modify your teachings if necessary.

According to Brown, teaching listening and teaching speaking can help students learn basic principles and formats for listening and speaking in the classroom. Are my students going to know how to listen to directions on paper, orally, etc.? Because my students will be in high school, I hope so. However, I need to be prepared at whatever curve balls are thrown at me. I feel like listening skills are taught in elementary school as a respect issue, but not all students follow the rules. The following characteristics need to be taken into consideration when teaching listening and speaking skills: clustering, redundancy, reduced forms, performance variables, colloquial language, rate of delivery, stress, rhythm, and intonation and interaction. It is important as a teacher to have listening goals for your students because you want to move them from beginning listeners to advanced. Doing many listening exercises will help them achieve this goal, such as listening to a sentence describing a picture then selecting the appropriate one. To make this activity a little more advanced, I would have students listen to the description then draw their own interpretation and explain why they drew what they did. Having conversations with students is one of the easiest ways to teach them how to speak but other strategies needed to be incorporated so students don’t become bored with the lesson. One student pretends to be a salesperson while looking at a catalog while the other student orders items. Because I will be teaching students how to speak “correct” English in class, I need to make sure that I avoid using fillers like “uhm” and “like” and “okay” while I am speaking. Overall for both reading and writing skills, the teacher needs to motivate the students and keep giving them positive feedback about their progress. Too much negative feedback leads learners into shutting off completely and will not attempt any more communication. Local errors do not need to be corrected but global errors need to be treated in a different way. The model for treatment of classroom speech errors would be a good model to keep nearby while teaching because it can be hard for teachers to resist always correcting students at times.

I agree with the article written by Cary in reference to celebrating all cultures of the students in the classroom. Students may feel more welcomed and not as shy about their background if students are allowed to talk about their culture and family life. I personally would like to do a cultural unit with my students where they can make food, give history, sing songs, show crafts and do a show and tell. I actually did something like this in a geography class and I enjoyed learning new facts about cultures around the world, some I didn’t even know existed. While I was involved in a teaching internship for a sixth grade Reading and Language Arts class, one student was Vietnamese and spoke little English. This was my first teaching experience so I was not sure exactly what to do. Should I have taught her a different way? Did she actually learn anything from me? I wish my high school teaching preparation classes would have helped me be more aware of the fact that students might not have English as their first language. I think students should be teaching some words/phrases to other students as well during these presentations. I love learning new things and the younger students are, the more adapt they are to learning new things and remembering them.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Blog #5- Kumar and Brown



Lauren Watters
English 345
September 24, 2012
Brown Chapter 4
Brown Chapter 16
Kumar Chapter 3

            Kumar tells us that teaching cannot automatically lead to learning because the learning is controlled by the learner. All I can think about when I read this is my junior year chemistry teacher in high school who expected all of the students to understand the material as soon as she presented it on the overhead. I was not interested in chemistry in the slightest. So I didn’t want to learn the material in the first place, but even when I tried to, it didn’t work. My teacher expected the students to learn the material instantly and that there should be no questions. She did not want to change her agenda to help out students who needed it. This specific teacher did not realize that learning opportunities are not bound by the teachers’ agenda, teaching materials and/or the syllabus. The “road conditions” may have been rough for this teacher, but she didn’t want to stop attend to her students needs, which is the exact opposite kind of teacher that I want to be. Most teachers use the textbook provided, create worksheets or word problems and have the expectation that every student can learn successfully this way. The textbook can be a springboard to launch the interactive process in the classroom. The idea of a teaching syllabus seems to be a rough draft of what teachers want to do in the classroom, but the learning syllabus is what students and teachers agree on doing within the classroom. Once the teaching syllabus is converted to a learning syllabus, students will find more opportunities to learn. When language learners speak with their target language, they are organizing and creating a sense of who they are in the world. When they pose questions, they are creating learning opportunities. The language learners need to know that their voice has a purpose in the classroom. Questions are very important such as yes/no questions, factual questions, opinion questions, and reasoning questions. However for L2 development, referential questions are more important than display questions. Open ended questions (referential) provide longer and more complex answers from the students. Why would teachers then continue to ask language learners display questions? How can we eliminate the majority of these all together?
            Brown begins chapter 4 by saying that it is still a mystery how learners successfully acquire second languages. Second language acquisition is not an easy task. After taking just over seven years of Spanish, I am still not fluent. I am still embarrassed by my speaking ability or lack thereof. It is a mystery to me how anyone masters another language if they are not learning it while learning their first language growing up. Twelve principles are cognitive because they relate to the intellectual functions. They are automaticity, meaningful learning, the anticipation of reward, strategic investment, autonomy, language ego, willingness to communicate, the language-culture connection, the native language effect, interlanguage and communicative competence. Language learning involves a timely movement of processing the language form. I agree with this because if I didn’t take a year or two off of learning Spanish, I might have the ability to be somewhat fluent. Or if I actually traveled to Spain like I had wanted to, I would be able to speak the language better. My timing for learning the language was not efficient which is why I feel uncomfortable speaking Spanish to another speaker, especially if Spanish is their native language. Then again, learning the language wasn’t necessarily meaningful to me because it’s not like I was immersed in the culture and needed to speak it every day. If it was more meaningful, I would have retained the information long term. Principle 8 talks about the willingness to communicate. If my students have anxiety about speaking their second language, like I do with Spanish, they will not have self-confidence and they might think what they are doing is not correct. This leads to students not wanting to participate at all because they are embarrassed. How can we as teachers show them that it is okay to make mistakes while they are learning a new language?
            Brown talks about strategy-based instruction in chapter 16. The more learners put in, the more they will get out of it. If they actually invest time and effort into their learning, they will develop better skills. Good language learners take charge of their learning, organize information about a language, are creative, etc. In order to learn, you need to take care of your own learning. If you don’t read the class material, you obviously won’t do well on the exam. Each learner needs to realize that they have to work hard to succeed and the teacher cannot force them to want to do well in class. The students need to be self driven, independent learners inside and outside of the classroom. The more students participate in the classroom and the more work they complete outside of the school, this will help lead to a successful language acquisition. Awareness styles include their beliefs, intelligence, self-efficacy, etc. Action strategies are used to help active these awareness styles. A learning styles checklist is a good informal way to get to know your students the first week of school. Self-confidence is also a big issue with second language learners. If you give them a checklist that rates them on a scale, you as a teacher can figure out how they feel about speaking in small groups, large groups or one on one with the teacher. Using different techniques is necessary to keep students motivated and I think that using checklists is a great way to get to know your students.